<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:ent="http://www.purl.org/NET/ENT/1.0/">
  <channel>
    <title>Curiouser and Curiouser! on dna-database</title>
    <link>http://matt.blogs.it/</link>
    <description>RSS feed for topic dna-database</description>
    <copyright>Copyright 2008 Matt Mower. Some rights reserved.</copyright>
    <generator>Squib/0.5.0.382</generator>
    <managingEditor>self@mattmower.com</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>self@mattmower.com</webMaster>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <item>
      <title>DNA for all</title>
      <link>http://matt.blogs.it/entries/00002800.html</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 08:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;As long term readers will, no doubt, guess I am concerned about the &lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7260164.stm"&gt;national DNA database&lt;/a&gt; we're slowly building. On the Radio this morning a government minister mentioned that they thought "they had the balance right" but that there should be no stigma in being on this "intelligence database" because it meant "you could be cleared from future investigations faster."&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This approach to denial - that the database is actually a good thing for you to be on - seems to me designed to be slowly relaxed into universality; That &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salami_tactics"&gt;salami tactics&lt;/a&gt; will be used to extend mandatory inclusion in the database.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If it's such a boon to be there I think the government should lead the way by ensuring that all MP's, Ministers, Lords, and senior civil servants should be asked to volunteer to be on there. If there is no stigma, and it's such a benefit, how can they possibly object?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://matt.blogs.it/entries/00002800.html</guid>
      <ent:cloud ent:href="http://matt.blogs.it/topics/">
      </ent:cloud>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
