<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:ent="http://www.purl.org/NET/ENT/1.0/">
  <channel>
    <title>Curiouser and Curiouser! on backup</title>
    <link>http://matt.blogs.it/</link>
    <description>RSS feed for topic backup</description>
    <copyright>Copyright 2007 Matt Mower. Some rights reserved.</copyright>
    <generator>Squib/0.5.0.382</generator>
    <managingEditor>self@mattmower.com</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>self@mattmower.com</webMaster>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <item>
      <title>My Leopard backup strategy</title>
      <link>http://matt.blogs.it/entries/00002689.html</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 23:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I caved in an installed Leopard this evening. Despite planning to wait for 10.5.1 when the disk arrived, well, okay, I'm weak.. I know it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I've decided to combine my existing strategy of having a bootable system clone using SuperDuper with TimeMachine. I have juggled my data about to free up a 500GB Seagate Freeagent drive. On that I have setup one 120GB partition for SuperDuper to smart clone to and the rest is given over to TimeMachine.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I realise there is a certain amount of duplication in this strategy but, where backup is concerned, I'm not sure that's a bad thing and given that TimeMachine backups are not bootable it strikes me as still being a good recovery strategy to have the bootable system image via SuperDuper. Possibly it would actually make more sense to use two different disks but that's going to require more juggling.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://matt.blogs.it/entries/00002689.html</guid>
      <ent:cloud ent:href="http://matt.blogs.it/topics/">
      </ent:cloud>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
