Book Notice: Effective XML Elliotte Rusty Harold, Polytechnic University, Brooklyn NY
Addison-Wesley (Pearson Education) has published Elliotte Rusty Harold's new book, Effective XML. The author provides fifty (50) practical rules of thumb for improving XML strategies, based upon real-world examples.
Effective XML is thus a collection of guidelines and best practices for using XML. It focuses on using and developing XML applications, with a particular emphasis on aspects of XML that are often misunderstood or misapplied. Since XML has become a fundamental underpinning of new software systems, it becomes important to begin asking new questions, not just what XML is, but one uses it effectively. Which techniques work and which don't? Perhaps most importantly, which techniques appear to work at first but fail to scale as systems are further developed? XML can be used to produce robust, extensible, maintainable, comprehensible systems or it can be used to create masses of unmaintainable, illegible, fragile, closed code. [XML Cover Pages]
Books with titles like 'Effective XXX' have had a good history for me (Effective C++ and Effective Java spring to mind). This one looks interesting.
It's funny, for years I have been a strong supporter of renationalizing the railways in the UK. As I listen to the government talking about bringing management of the railways back in house and talk of the public subsidy required to to do the job I realse I don't believe it any more.
A subsidized railway is not free. It is paid for by our tax money. The goverment takes it from us, by force if necessary, and hands it over to companies over whom we have no control. More and more of it disappears into the sinkhole that is the British rail system every year. Yet have you heard even a single passenger trumpeting the improvements they have made?
The government and the industry say it will cost billions of pounds and take many years just to get back to the levels of service everyone was complaining about before the Hatfield rail crash. I don't believe they will do it. I believe it is good money poured after bad.
I think a significant aspect of the problem is that the Railway companies aren't as interested in the passengers as they are in pleading to government for more subsidy. In effect pleading for the government to rob us of more money, to hand over to them. Well I don't want to give it to them.
Let me repeat that: I do not want to give the government any more money for the railways!
I think that the state cash supply for the railways should be turned off and as soon as is practical. Let them turn instead to their customers for their revenues. Let them persuade customers to pay for their services on a fair basis. All that tax money should be immediately returned to the tax-payer in the form of a cut in the basic rate of income tax, VAT, or National Insurance. Whichever will benefit the most number of people.
To those who argue that prices would go up I say "I agree." If you want to use the railway then pay them. And you should have a little more money in your pocket to do so.
To those who argue that the poor may not be able to afford it I say "I agree." This could be a problem. But I think that there are solutions to be found. Maybe people could come together to create purchasing blocks to force a better price from rail companies? They're surely going to need their business.
And if, after all this, the railways can't survive. Then let them die and be replaced by something more fit to serve us.
But don't keep lining their pockets with my taxes. It's not fair.
Envoy questioned over art attack. Sweden seeks answers from the Israeli ambassador after he vandalises a work of art depicting a suicide bomber. [BBC News | World | UK Edition]
Maybe someone can tell me why this is in bad taste? I don't see a call to Jihad but a piece questioning why an intelligent woman would see the culmination of her life being to blow up herself and passers-by. Isn't that a question worth asking? Further I don't understand why this work is anti-semitic. Maybe someone can explain that to me as well.
Microsoft lawyers threaten Mike Rowe (17). Losing the domain name plot [The Register]
I find it disturbing that by offering to sell a domain name you own you are considered to be acting in bad faith. After all, how much do you want to keep any domain you own? If someone offered Microsoft $100bn cash on the nail for Microsoft.com is Bill Gates acting in bad faith if he considers the offer? Or if he responds by asking for $200bn?
When did considering selling something you own become a bad thing? I must have missed that meeting.